Chapters ← Table of Contents

Part One — The Diagnosis

Part Two — The Alternative

Time for UBI: How Capitalism Broke the World and How Time Can Fix It

By Stefano Virgilli

The Million Dollar Test

Do you have more than one million dollars in cash or assets? If yes, put this book down. It's not for you.

If you're still reading, then you're one of us. The 98.5 percent. A worldwide number, regardless of skin color, nationality, or continent. You're someone who works — or who has worked, or who will work — to meet your basic needs. You're someone for whom the question of how to pay for next month isn't an abstraction but a feeling. A weight. A thing you carry into every conversation about the future, even the ones supposed to be about something else.

This book is for you.

I spent twenty years chasing a number. I don't mean metaphorically. I mean I organized my adult life — the countries I lived in, the work I did, the hours I gave, the relationships I compromised — around a figure on a spreadsheet that was never quite large enough. The number moved. It always moves. You hit one target and the target shifts, because the system has no destination. It has a direction, and the direction is more, and the word for a person who has internalized that direction so completely that they can't stop moving isn't ambitious. It's zombie.

I was the zombie. Six countries in twenty years — Italy, Singapore, Oman, Malaysia, Thailand, the UAE — chasing a number that kept moving. Not as an adventurer. As a man who had organized his entire adult life around being useful in places where the work was, where the spreadsheet said to go. I left my mother two decades ago to build a career abroad, and I won't get those twenty years back. I won't get back the dinners, the afternoons, the ordinary weekdays when she was there and I was somewhere else, optimizing. The hustle. The permanent low-grade anxiety of someone who has everything he needs and can't stop acting as if he doesn't.

And then I stopped.

I started writing this book in Dubai. I could see the cranes from my window. One, two, three — eleven, twenty. Luxury towers rising over labor camps. The people building those towers earn a fraction of what the people buying the apartments will spend on a single piece of furniture inside them. The workers come from Pakistan, from Bangladesh, from Nepal. They're here because the economy at home offered them nothing, and the economy here offers them just enough to justify the distance from their families and the conditions they live in. The towers are beautiful. The cranes are busy. I was sitting inside the argument I was about to make.

A few months before the war, I was walking through a mall in Dubai and passed one of the pop-up shops that real estate developers set up between the perfume counters and the handbag stores — temporary storefronts designed to catch you mid-errand and sell you a future. A property agent working the Dubai Creek development stopped me. He was good at his job — the kind of confidence that comes from selling a product that has never gone down. He told me a unit in the development had appreciated fifty percent in the past year. He told me that if I bought it now, it would go up another fifty percent in the year ahead. I asked him the only question that matters: when does it stop? He looked at me the way you look at someone who's asked something slightly embarrassing, and he said: it doesn't stop. It never stops. Dubai will always grow. There will always be more tourists, more investors, more money flowing in. The model has no ceiling.

I think about that conversation now.

On February 28, 2026, a joint coalition of Israeli and American forces attacked Iran. Iran retaliated against US military installations across the Gulf. Within days, the skyline I'd been writing about was no longer a metaphor for anything. It was a city recalculating. I left Dubai eight days into the war. I'm writing this updated paragraph from Bangkok, nearly a month into a conflict that no property agent's spreadsheet had a column for.

I'm not telling this story to be right about Dubai. I tell it because that property agent wasn't lying to me. He believed what he was saying. He believed it the way most people inside capitalism believe its central promise: that growth is permanent, that the line goes up, that the system will always expand because expansion is what the system does. He wasn't a fool. He was a person who'd been inside a rising market long enough that the rising felt like physics rather than luck. And when the physics broke — when a war reminded everyone that the world isn't a spreadsheet — the fragility of the whole arrangement became visible in a way that no amount of arguing could have made it visible before.

Capitalism's most dangerous promise isn't that it will make you rich. The promise is that it will never stop. That growth is infinite. That the line doesn't bend. Every property agent in a pop-up shop, every quarterly earnings call, every politician who says the economy is strong — they're all standing on the same assumption. And the assumption holds until it doesn't. It held in Dubai until February 28, 2026.

Even here in Bangkok, the cranes are building. Extraordinary new luxury condominiums rising in Phrom Phong and Thong Lo — a study room with a wall down the middle relabeled as a one-bedroom, thirty-four square meters, priced in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Built by people who struggle to put together a thousand dollars a month. The skyline changes. The argument doesn't.

This book isn't communist. It isn't socialist. It doesn't ask anyone to give up their money. It doesn't propose a revolution that burns anything down. It proposes something quieter, something never tried before: changing the currency itself.

But before we get to the currency, I need to tell you something about how I got here. Not the research — that comes later, chapter by chapter, source by source. Something more personal than that. Two stories from the life I lived before I started writing this book, both of which planted a seed I didn't recognize until years later.

Prologue — Two Stories

La Cicala e la Formica

The first is a fable. In Italy, where I grew up, every child learns the story of La Cicala e la Formica — the Cicada and the Ant. The ant works all summer, storing food, preparing for winter. The cicada sings and rests and enjoys the warm days. When winter comes, the ant is safe and the cicada starves. The moral, as I was taught it, is simple: work is virtue. Rest is irresponsibility. The ant is right. The cicada is lazy. And if you end up hungry, you have only yourself to blame.

I absorbed that story the way you absorb the air — without choosing to, without noticing, without knowing it was shaping how I'd think about work and rest and value and worth for the rest of my life. I grew up believing there's always time to work and never time to stop. That the ant is the hero. That the cicada deserves what she gets. That summer never ends, and you should always be harvesting, even when your body's telling you it needs a season to be still.

It took me a very long time to understand what the fable actually says. Not the version I was taught — the capitalist version, the one that turns a story about seasons into a story about deserving. The original version. The one where the farmer works all summer because that's what summer is for, and then rests all winter because that's what winter is for. The ant was wise for knowing when to stop, not virtuous for working without stopping. The season of rest was the point. It was what the work was for.

Capitalism took that fable and removed the winter. It said: there's no season when you're allowed to rest. There's only more summer, more planting, more harvesting, forever, and if you stop — if you sit down, if you breathe, if you dare to enjoy a warm afternoon without producing something — then you're the cicada, and the cicada deserves nothing.

That's the first thing I had to unlearn before I could write this book.

The Square Nobody Will Name

The second story is about a square in the town where I grew up.

About forty years ago, the local government named a public square after Antonio Gramsci. He was an Italian intellectual and political thinker who spent the last decade of his life in a fascist prison, writing notebooks that would become some of the most influential texts in twentieth-century political theory. His central idea — cultural hegemony, the observation that the ruling class maintains power not through force alone but by making its worldview feel like common sense — is one of the most powerful analytical tools ever developed for understanding how systems perpetuate themselves without most people ever noticing.

The square was named. A sign went up. And some people in my town — not all, but enough — refused to say the name.

They called it "the Direzionale" — a bureaucratic nothing-word, a label with no meaning, the verbal equivalent of looking past something you've been taught not to see. They walked through that square every day. They sat on its benches. Their children played there. And they wouldn't say the name. Not because they'd read Gramsci and disagreed with him. Not because they'd examined his ideas and found them wanting. Not because he'd done anything to them or to anyone they knew. Because the name had been made into something you can't say. The conditioning doesn't require knowledge of the thing being conditioned against. You just know you can't say it. You don't know why. You just know.

And that — exactly that — is what happened when my friend heard "universal basic income" and said: "That's communist bullshit."

The reflex didn't come from analysis. It came from the same place the refusal to say Gramsci's name comes from. From a culture that taught him what to fear without announcing that's what it was doing. From stories, from films, from the background hum of a civilization that has decided certain questions can't be asked and certain words can't be spoken — because the answers might land somewhere dangerous.

This book is the conversation that friend wouldn't have. It begins with a diagnosis — what capitalism is, where it came from, what it has done, and why every previous attempt to fix it has failed. It ends with a proposal — a system built on a different currency, one that can't be accumulated without limit, one that arrives in equal measure to every person alive. Between the diagnosis and the proposal, there are stories, and research, and anger, and numbers, and history, and a few moments where I hope you'll feel something shift.

Nobody's touching your money. We changed the currency. That's all.

But if you couldn't say the word without flinching — now you know who taught you to flinch. And you can decide whether to keep doing it.

Contents